SanJorge wrote:For me its clear that higher variety will not happen, it will be claymore instead of great maul, that all, for the reason is clear , and strange that Punisher agree to this with his 1000 chars ( prolly some strange fighters too), some players don't want to try different builds in the same class.
It will be boring as hell. just put it in alpha 1st.
Okis now I want hear facts SanJorge.
Here is my facts:
Fact 1) Claymores looses in base damage for great mauls 3d6 VS 2d6 AND ALSO for halberds 3d6 VS 2d6.
So: Especially in "bersker stance" (that I always use.) You loose pretty much damage Claymore VS Great Maul
PS. Even with speed factors higher base damage wins.
Fact 2) Normal xp / loot hunting (about 90% of time I play) I always choose great maul over halberd because of flurry. So that why no halberd. (Flurry + thunder clap is best moves in PVE)
Fact 3) Claymores flurry + cleave combo is NOT effective in normal (like dragon / shadow folk) hunting (about 90% of time I play.. maybe even 95%)
Fact 4) Claymores flurry + cleave combo is effective in special situations (like 1%-5% of game time?)
Like: I can cleave + flurry combo "The beholder". And yes Claymore is here BETTER than great maul. But this is diversity!
SanJorge wrote: it will be claymore instead of great maul, that all, for the reason is clear
Why the heck I should use claymore over great maul in "normal hunting" if it have worse damage and worse specials (Normal PVE hunting)?
I think this is just rage.. but tell me if u got facts.
Also tell what is that "clear reason" to use claymore NOT great maul?